29/10/2026
A taxpayer can sometimes introduce new facts at the appeal stage. That does not mean it should plan to.
The Tax Court judgment in Taxpayer KG confirms a clear boundary: you may refine a genuine dispute if the new ground still targets the same part or amount of the assessment. What you cannot do is open an entirely new front against a different component. That distinction, reinforced by Baseline, can decide whether a matter is ever heard on its merits.
The real lesson is evidentiary discipline. When a major asset is acquired, the tax file must tell the same commercial story as the board papers and feasibility studies. Purposes that exist from day one should be evidenced contemporaneously, not reconstructed after SARS challenges the return.
At Fyncor Advisory we assist clients to preserve that battlefield from the outset — structuring the commercial and tax narrative early, crafting objections that protect the true scope of the dispute, and building the contemporaneous record that turns a technical right into a winnable case.