06/06/2026
📊 Claiming Social Security at 62 with a full retirement age of 67 locks in 70% of your full benefit, while waiting to 70 pays 124%, a permanent gap of 77%.
Claiming at 62 is still the right call in plenty of cases: poor health, thin savings, or a single filer with no survivor depending on the record.
The common objection that average lifespan is only 76 uses life expectancy at birth, which counts everyone who died young.
A man who has already reached 65 lives to about 84 on average, a woman to about 87, and roughly 1 in 4 people who reach 65 will live past 90.
Claiming age and retirement age are also separate decisions; you can stop working at 62 and still delay the benefit by spending from savings first.
The earnings test only applies if you work while collecting before full retirement age: $1 is withheld for every $2 earned above $24,480 in 2026, and withheld amounts come back as a larger check at FRA.
For married couples, the higher earner's claiming age sets the survivor benefit, since the widow or widower keeps the larger of the two checks.
A survivor who claims at 60 receives 71.5% of the deceased spouse's benefit; reaching 100% requires waiting until the survivor's own full retirement age.
The deeper problem with break-even math is that it grades insurance like an investment: if you delay and die early, the forgone checks were dollars a short retirement never needed, while a delay that runs to 95 pays off exactly when a portfolio is most at risk of running out.
For a 62-year-old couple, the odds that at least one spouse reaches 90 are high, and the survivor's check is the one a delay protects.
P.S. Every Friday I send a short email with the week's top post, my take on the best article I read, and what I'm writing about on the site. Link in the comments.
*The content shared here is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not personalized investment, tax, legal, or financial advice. Consult a licensed professional before making decisions based on your specific situation.*
