Blueprint Financial Advisors, LLC

Blueprint Financial Advisors, LLC Holistic Fee-Only Financial Planning firm in NE Portland. Owner/Advisor Ted Guerin, AWMA ™ , CRPC ™ We are also a fiduciary. I know what my "why" is ;)

Blueprint Financial Advisors is a boutique, fee-only financial planning firm. I am sure you are asking yourself, great, sounds fancy, what does that mean for me? It means we are legally obligated to look out for your best interests (at a minimum), beyond that we get to know our clients on a much deeper level than just a risk tolerance questionnaire and are always accessible to answer any and all q

uestions you have. Not only do we strive to take the guesswork out of getting financial advice, but we make sure that any and all advice given is designed specifically for you. As I always tell my clients, the numbers are the easy part, making sure we understand your "whys" or your values is the secret sauce to any great financial plan. As for me personally, Blueprint Financial Advisors is my firm. I live in NE Portland with my wife and kids, if I am not working I am either coaching or taking the kids to some sporting event or playing golf. I run my firm (mostly) virtually, which allows me to work with clients up and down the West Coast, focusing on small business owners, busy professional and retirees. Having young kids, I don't anticpate going back to an in-person, office setting any time soon, working from home/virtually allows me to both run a successful financial planning company and also be present/available for my family.

Happy Easter! Putting all your eggs in one basket might feel efficient… until that basket tips over and suddenly you’re ...
04/05/2026

Happy Easter!

Putting all your eggs in one basket might feel efficient… until that basket tips over and suddenly you’re explaining your life choices to a licensed professional (or even worse, a spouse!). A well-diversified portfolio accepts that uncertainty is part of the game and builds in protection against it. Instead of betting everything on a single outcome, you’re giving yourself multiple ways to succeed—less drama, fewer emergency therapy sessions, and a much smoother path toward long-term goals. A diversified approach helps absorb those shocks, so one bad break doesn’t send your entire plan into a tailspin.

If you are in your 20's and 30's and have some "fun" money, sure, buy that stock your dad's friend, who has a cousin, who has a brother who manages a hedge fund in Panama thinks everyone should get in on. Just don't risk anything you aren't wiling to lose everything on.

TL;DR No. Trump accounts suck. UTMAs are a better option in most cases. All hat, no cattle. As someone who prides himsel...
01/31/2026

TL;DR No. Trump accounts suck. UTMAs are a better option in most cases. All hat, no cattle.

As someone who prides himself on looking at investments and finances holistically, I feel like a conversation is missing...

There’s been a lot of breathless coverage lately about “Trump Accounts” — government-seeded investment accounts for kids that are being pitched as some bold new solution to wealth inequality. Start early, let compounding do the work, give every child a head start. I understand why that sounds compelling. But once you move past the slogans and actually look at the mechanics, the whole thing feels far less impressive.

At their core, Trump Accounts are just tax-deferred investment accounts with distributions taxed as ordinary income. That’s it. And that detail matters far more than the headlines suggest. Tax deferral is helpful, sure, but ordinary income taxation on the back end is a meaningful downgrade compared to capital gains treatment — and it’s nowhere near as powerful as tax-free growth. Delaying taxes is not the same thing as eliminating them, and pretending otherwise is how people end up disappointed at exactly the wrong moment.

What really gets me is how these accounts are being marketed. Trump officials keep boosting them by saying things like, “If you just contribute $400 a month, your child could have $100,000 by age 18.” Yeah, no s**t. That’s how saving and compound interest works. You don’t need a new government-branded account to demonstrate the math of regular contributions over 18 years. That example says nothing about whether the account structure is actually good — just that compounding exists.

What’s even more frustrating is that we already have better tools, right now, and almost no one in the public conversation is talking about them. Take UTMAs. They’re routinely dismissed as “just taxable accounts for kids,” which is technically true and practically misleading. Thanks to the kiddie tax rules, a child can earn a meaningful amount of unearned income each year before their parents’ marginal tax rate even applies. When those dollars are invested in tax-efficient index funds, a UTMA can compound with surprisingly little tax drag for a long time. In real planning terms, many UTMAs behave like a light tax-deferred wrapper well into six figures — but you wouldn’t know that from most media coverage.

Then there’s the moment everyone ignores: age 18. This is where all the theory collides with reality. Trump Account withdrawals become taxable ordinary income right when a young adult is trying to get started. UTMA withdrawals are typically capital gains, often taxed at very low rates. Roth IRA dollars are tax-free. Same market returns, wildly different outcomes, purely because of tax structure. That difference compounds just as powerfully as investment returns do — and it’s almost completely absent from the conversation.

And of course, Roth IRAs for kids with earned income barely get mentioned at all. If a child has earned income, parents can cover living expenses while wages flow into a Roth. That’s decades of tax-free compounding starting absurdly early in life. No new program. No press release. Just understanding how the existing rules actually work.

What bothers me about the Trump Account hype isn’t the idea of encouraging investing — that part is fine. It’s the way shiny new programs get promoted without any serious discussion of tax mechanics, withdrawal timing, or real-world tradeoffs. Real wealth isn’t built by novelty. It’s built by understanding the system as it exists and using it deliberately.

Side note for those who really want something to chew on: there are ways families quietly use UTMAs in combination with Roth IRAs to convert taxable dollars into long-term tax-free wealth once kids start working. It’s completely legal, deeply under-discussed, and far more powerful than most headline-friendly proposals. I’ll leave that there.

This is the kind of stuff I think about when I plan. Not slogans. Not shiny accounts. The math. The timing. The tax consequences no one wants to talk about — but everyone eventually feels.

Real planning happens in the details — not in slogans designed to sound good on cable news.

Side note: If you've read this far along, I will also like to add F**k ICE! Values and integrity matter more than optimizing a balance sheet. Being good with money is not an excuse to be indifferent to cruelty, state violence, or the harm done to people who are already vulnerable. I’m not interested in separating “financial success” from basic human decency.

With strict rules and limited tax benefits, Trump accounts aren’t right for every family—particularly if they’ re not eligible for government or private seed contributions.

First item, I am sure most people who have activated their online Social Security got one of these emails stating that "...
07/04/2025

First item, I am sure most people who have activated their online Social Security got one of these emails stating that "90% of beneficiaires will no longer pay taxes". Pardon my French, but that is total bulls**t. 1) 64% of SS recipients already don't pay any taxes on their benefits, so they absolutely misrepresenting the impact of the BBB and also destroying the credibilty of a non-partisan org. 2) The BBB merely adding a $6k or $12k/yr dedution. Helpful sure, but there is also a phaseout above $75k/$150k. So, there is a chunk of retirees who will benefit from this, which is great, I just don't like them lying about it.

Second, this whole conversation is WAY beyond money at this point. Across the board, in this bill, folks got little breaks for tip income, overtime income, SALT deduction, etc. There are all sorts of qualifying language that limits these benefits to certain incomes and for a certain period of time. HOWEVER, the cost of getting an extra $1,000-$2,000/yr is the absolute destruction of the social safey net for A LOT of vulnerable Americans. Both professionally and personally, I think it is disgusting.

Lastly, maybe this is an odd post for a financial planner who manages investments. I don't think it is. At my firm, I believe financial planning isn’t just about numbers—it’s about people, purpose, and the kind of future we want to build together. Holistic planning means seeing the full picture: not just how much money you have, but how that money supports your values, relationships, goals, and legacy.

We also believe that the same principles apply to society as a whole. When wealth is concentrated at the top and opportunity is stripped from the bottom, everyone loses. A healthy society, like a healthy financial plan, works best when everyone has a stake in the outcome. We grow stronger—not just richer—when we invest in each other, when we lift others up financially and emotionally, and when we measure success not just by profit, but by impact.

Thanks for listening to my Teddy talk ;) *don't sue me!*

I spend much of my time thinking about wealth, money, opportunity, legacy, etc. Yes, it is my job to do those things. Bu...
09/13/2024

I spend much of my time thinking about wealth, money, opportunity, legacy, etc. Yes, it is my job to do those things. But I mean, more abstractly, as well. I think it is interesting and heartbreaking at the same time...(plus I am sure I am thinking about this more since my kiddos are now 9 and has me thinking about my childhood).

I grew up in a small, rural, logging community in Southern Oregon. My life then is much different than my life now. However, that experience has deeply influenced my thoughts on hard work, success, the urban/rural divide, etc. It has also had a profound impact on my view of government/federal support as it relates to kids. To be clear, I am not one of those "I made it because I worked hard" type of folks, I have major disdain for the Horatio Alger myth. I wouldn't be where I was without major financial support in college (and a lot of luck). In this article below (I'll add some charts from it in the comments section as well), it lays out that the best indicator that a child will be successful in life is if they have successful parents. Pretty simple, right? Does this mean that folks with higher incomes "deserve" it, absolutely not. I guess what I am saying is that the government should be there to level the playing field more than they are. Most of that support would/should go to rural areas, which is ironic, because they usually have the whole "don't tread of me" vibe as of late, but they need it.

The data is clear, the economic divide is getting worse and we are asleep at the wheel hiding behind strange beliefs like "having a bad credit score makes you a bad person". No, it doesn't, it just means you don't have any money. Or that if you have a high income you must've deserved that. Nope, I know plenty of people (I see you teachers, social workers, etc), who bust their asses and deserve much more than they get.

Maybe more soon on this...

Thanks for coming to my Talks with Ted :) (sue me!) hahaha

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

The answer: Probably. Yes. Well, it depends :) First, you determine a figure that Social Security calls “combined income...
02/01/2024

The answer: Probably. Yes. Well, it depends :)

First, you determine a figure that Social Security calls “combined income” (also sometimes called “provisional income”). The formula to calculate your combined income is:

Combined income = Adjusted gross income + Nontaxable interest + 50% of your Social Security benefit

From there, you can determine how much of your Social Security benefits are subject to taxes:

After that, it gets really tricky: The tax impact of tax-deferred withdrawals or required minimum distributions, IRMAA surcharges (Part B and D Medicare premiums, etc.

It is doubtful, even if you have a modest amount of investment assets that you'll be able to avoid social security taxation altogether, but with some careful (and strategic) planning you can lessen the load and increase your net income in retirement.

I know this is my job, but I love this phase of retirement planning, it is like a jigsaw puzzle, but with money ;)

Here’s how to determine what you owe this tax season.

Mutual funds are great for diversification but oftentimes terrible for tax efficiency. The first tip, is don't hold acti...
12/02/2022

Mutual funds are great for diversification but oftentimes terrible for tax efficiency. The first tip, is don't hold actively managed mutual funds in your taxable account. Why? Well, this year will be a great example where the fund is down 10%-15%, yet is going to pay out sizeable capital gain distributions. So, not only are you losing money, but you now also have to pay taxes on cap gains disbursement. So, if you happen to own an actively managed fund in a taxable account, be prepared to be disappointed...

Despite poor returns for most funds this year, many are distributing capital gains.

There is a reason I don't take on investment clients without doing any financial planning work. How can you create a pro...
10/26/2022

There is a reason I don't take on investment clients without doing any financial planning work. How can you create a professional investment portfolio without knowing what you are trying to achieve? And no, "more", is not a good answer. I want to retire early, why? I want to invest in sustainable companies, why? I want to pay as in taxes as possible, why? You get the point...

Don't let your portfolio guide your financial values, let your financial values guide your portfolio.

The new yield for I bonds purchased after the end of October is now estimated to be 6.47%, down from a record 9.62%.FYI,...
10/13/2022

The new yield for I bonds purchased after the end of October is now estimated to be 6.47%, down from a record 9.62%.

FYI, Because of the twice-yearly resets, the date you purchase your I bonds can make a big difference to their returns. The rate changes every six months from the bond’s purchase date, based on the prevailing rate. That rate is good for six months, when the bonds take on the new rate.

As an example, I bonds purchased in October would assume the current rate ⁠— 9.62% ⁠— for six months, until the end of March. From next April, they would assume the new, lower rate ⁠— 6.47% ⁠— that will likely take effect Nov. 1.

The new yield for I bonds purchased after the end of October is now estimated to be 6.47%, down from a record 9.62%.

TL;DR $1.7 million. Of course, as with most financial articles (why do I continue to read these!), I don't see how this ...
08/02/2022

TL;DR $1.7 million.

Of course, as with most financial articles (why do I continue to read these!), I don't see how this is helpful except to cause anxiety to those who don't have that much saved (or will never have that much saved for retirement).

A few thoughts:

-$1.7 million in an IRA is much different than $1.7 million in a non-qualfied account (see: taxes).
-With a 4% withdrawal rate, that is about $68,000/year, not including social security, for some people that is easily enough to cover living expenses (depends on location and other obligations).
-Cash flow (rental properites, share of existing business, etc.) can potenially be as, or more important, than traditional retirement assets...

To summarize, articles like this are fairly wortheless, unless you don't have enough saved. Remember, there is no better time to start than right now. Give yourself some grace for past "mistakes" and push forward.

A thousand workers told Schwab that they need an average of $1.7 million in savings to pay for retirement. But inflation, monthly expenses, stock market volatility and other retirement obstacles are keeping them from reaching their goals. Here's what the … Continue reading → The post Here's How ...

Your mind isn't playing tricks on you, your target-date funds (I'm looking at you 2025 funds) have been awful in 2022, d...
06/16/2022

Your mind isn't playing tricks on you, your target-date funds (I'm looking at you 2025 funds) have been awful in 2022, down 17%. So, yes, the market is awful at the moment, but these target-date funds have been extra special awful...why?:

1) Top Heavy. Too much exposure to long-term bonds and too much emphasis on cap weighting (FAANG stocks).
2) No diversification in an inflationary environment (very limited exposure to commodities, energy, gold, and real estate).

That isn't to say they are terrible, they are great little vehicles that can be "set it and forget it" over time but they suck in a bear market. If you are a DIYer, you can still build out a super cheap portfolio that is diversified and built for a rockier market environment...

Note: This should not be considered investment advice. Every client's situation is uniquely theirs, please consult your investment advisor.

The story behind this year’s results.

A great take (and short article) on the current inflationary environment:"The CPI’s 12-month rate of change is inflated ...
05/29/2022

A great take (and short article) on the current inflationary environment:

"The CPI’s 12-month rate of change is inflated by big jumps in June and October of 2021 and March of this year. As a result, the 12-month rate of change will remain high regardless of what happens to the CPI over the next couple of months. One illustration of this: even if the CPI had remained unchanged from March to April, the headline number for April would still have been 7.9%.

This puts the current discussion about inflation in an entirely different light. The month-to-month inflation rate doesn’t have to get any lower than it was in April in order for the CPI’s 12-month rate of change to fall to 4.1% — once the past year’s big spikes in inflation drop out of the trailing 12-month period.

Until those spikes drop out of the calculation, the headline inflation number will remain stubbornly high — not because the Federal Reserve is doing a bad job-fighting inflation but because of simple arithmetic."

Focusing on the monthly rate of change in the CPI shows prices falling from March to April.

Address

Portland, OR
97212

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Blueprint Financial Advisors, LLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Blueprint Financial Advisors, LLC:

Share