Trading Stock Picks live

01/05/2026

Big issue reveald in Large language models: read in the pictures as Chatgpt explain it. ChatGPT Community

09/10/2025

a hotter-than-expected CPI tomorrow is possible—even though today's PPI came in well below estimates. The short answer? Yes, absolutely possible. Here's why—and I won't sugar-coat it.

Key Why PPI ≠ CPI in the Short Term
1. Different baskets, different coverage

PPI tracks prices producers receive—including for goods sold to businesses, exports, and capital investment. It excludes imports and things like owners' equivalent rent.

CPI tracks what consumers pay—a basket of goods and services including imports, rent, taxes, fees, and more.
These indices aren't apples to apples.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
+1

2. Weak short-term correlation

Economists have found that PPI doesn’t consistently forecast CPI in the short run. Even when there's a divergence, CPI doesn't always “catch up” or mirror PPI.
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
FRED Blog

3. Pricing power & margins matter

If producers face lower input costs (a soft PPI print), they could lower prices—though if demand is strong or they lack pricing power, they might hold prices steady or even raise them.

Margin pressures or trade services (like retail markups) can distort how PPI feeds into consumer prices.
Schwab Brokerage

One commenter on investment forums summed it up bluntly:

“PPI does not always translate to CPI directly, a bigger factor is pricing power…”
Reddit

4. Lagged and varied transition of costs to consumers

PPI measures costs at the wholesale or producer level. Those costs don’t instantly show up in CPI. Retailers may delay passing on cost changes, or markup differently, depending on inventory, demand, or competitive dynamics.

Not to mention—CPI includes services like housing, healthcare, transit, education, whose inflation pressures may move independently of producer price trends.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
+1

The Bottom Line: Can CPI be hotter even if PPI is subdued? Yes.

A weak PPI print today doesn’t rule out a strong CPI tomorrow. Why? Because:

PPI might be missing key elements (e.g., rent, imports).

Services inflation—as seen in "supercore" services—can heat up CPI independently.
Schwab Brokerage

Consumer-facing inflation dynamics often diverge. Wholesalers can absorb cost swings, buffer them, or pass them on in ways that mask—or delay—the impact.

PPI (Producer Prices) CPI (Consumer Prices)
Measures prices producers get Measures what consumers pay
Can be below expectations Can still surprise on the upside
Weak short-term correlation Driven heavily by services & shelter
Lagged cost pass-through Influenced by rent, taxes, imports

So stop expecting one gauge to mirror the other immediately. Today's subdued PPI isn’t a safety net against tomorrow’s hot CPI.

09/10/2025

If tomorrow’s CPI comes in hotter than expected, the risk for U.S. equities is downside across the board. Here’s the breakdown, no sugar-coating:

Immediate market reaction

Rates spike: Treasury yields, especially 2-year and 10-year, will jump as markets price in stickier inflation and fewer/further Fed cuts.

Equities drop: Growth and tech (QQQ, mega-caps) will get hit hardest because their valuations depend on low discount rates.

USD strengthens: Dollar up → bad for multinationals and commodities.

Sector impact

Losers:

Tech / high-multiple stocks (QQQ, NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META).

Discretionary (AMZN, TSLA).

Small caps (IWM), which are rate sensitive.

Relative winners / defensive:

Energy (XLE) if oil stays high.

Utilities (XLU) and Staples (XLP) could hold better but not immune.

Banks (XLF) may benefit short-term from higher yields but risk credit tightening later.

Options / Volatility

VIX will spike.

Puts on SPY/QQQ gain value fast.

Skew steepens (puts become more expensive relative to calls).

Macro narrative risk

Hot CPI = Fed can’t cut (or cuts fewer times).

Market pricing for rate cuts in 2025 gets repriced downward → equity multiples compress.

Bond/equity correlation flips negative (both down).

Bottom line:
If CPI is hot, expect SPY/QQQ gap down at the open, heavy selling in tech, a flight to cash and defensive sectors, and higher yields pressuring all long-duration assets. Risk is a sharp short-term drawdown (2–4% fast move possible in QQQ) with follow-through if inflation looks sticky rather than a one-off.

08/14/2025

Equity & Bond Fund Flows—The Cold Hard Numbers

From the Investment Company Institute (ICI) for the week ending August 6:

$17.6 billion flowed out of equity funds—that’s real money pulling out.

In contrast, bond funds netted $14.2 billion in inflows, notably in taxable bonds.

Meanwhile, broader ETF data for early August shows:

Investors fleeing equities and plunging into Treasuries and gold.

TLT and GLDM both had solid inflows (~$596M and ~$536M respectively), while ultra-short Treasury ETFs like SGOV and BIL collected $3.9 billion.

08/14/2025

Big Tech is losing its grip as funds chase sectors like consumer, energy, utilities, healthcare—a healthier, broader rally if this holds.

08/14/2025

Market Snapshot
Inflation Shock Waves

Producer Prices (PPI) rose 0.9% in July, the steepest monthly jump in over three years, versus expectations of around 0.2%
chwab Brokerage

Year-over-year, wholesale prices jumped 3.3%, significantly above the roughly 2.5% forecast

That rocked the Fed-rate-cut narrative—markets saw rate-cut odds fall sharply, undermining optimism for a September easing

Stocks React

Most U.S. stocks slipped after the inflation data, though not bleeding red by any means

Smart tech players, led by Amazon (+3.5%), helped anchor indexes—even as smaller caps like the Russell 2000 dropped ~1.5%

Dow fell 0.2%, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq were roughly flat, off earlier record peaks

Still, the S&P 500 closed at a new record, showing just how finely poised this market remains

Bonds & Yields

Yields firmed up: the 2-year Treasury yield ticked to ~3.74%, and the 10-year climbed to ~4.29%, both moving higher as rate anxiety spiked

WHAT IT ALL MEANS:

Today’s wholesale inflation data dragged rate-cut hopes through the mud—the market can’t ignore it anymore.

The fact that major indices held up—even closed at highs—is telling: Big Tech thrifted for now.

But under the hood, the damage is real—yields rising, small caps under pressure, and breath is tightening.

If the Fed doesn’t pivot soon, this market may revert fast from record highs.

08/07/2025

The chart setup I have highlight across SPY (Chart 3), DIA (Chart 2), and QQQ (Chart 1) shows a divergent breakout pattern:

SPY and QQQ have clearly broken out to new highs.

DIA (Dow Jones) is failing to break out above its previous highs from late 2024.

This divergence or decoupling is not common, but it's not unprecedented. Historically, similar setups occurred during key late-cycle or early-recession phases, and here's what has typically followed:

Historical Analogues (similar pattern setups):
1. Late 1999 – Early 2000 (Dot-Com Bubble)
NASDAQ (like QQQ) and SPX (like SPY) pushed to new highs aggressively.

DOW lagged and failed to break out cleanly.

Outcome:

1 month later: Continued rally in tech.

6 months later: All three indices had topped out.

1 year later: Severe tech crash; Dow held up longer but eventually followed.

2. Mid 2007
SPY and QQQ made new highs (SPY broke slightly higher than 2000 peak).

DIA was stalling.

Outcome:

1 month later: Minor continuation.

6 months later: All indices dropped into full financial crisis.

3. Mid 2018
QQQ outperformed with new highs.

SPY made a mild new high.

DIA showed weakness earlier.

Outcome:

1 month later: Mild rally.

6 months later: Major drop (Q4 2018 correction of -20%).

Statistical Summary (Based on Analogues)
Period Index Divergence Outcome 1-Month Return 6-Month Return
1999–2000 Tech up, Dow lagging, recession brewing +3% to +8% -10% to -35%
2007 SPY/QQQ breakout, Dow sideways, credit tightening 0% to +2% -15% to -50%
2018 QQQ new highs, Dow rangebound +2% -18%

Current Pattern Alignment (2025)
This current setup closely mirrors 1999/2000 and late 2007:

Mega-cap tech is driving index strength (QQQ)

Dow Jones weakness signals caution about industrials, cyclicals, and broader economic confidence

Key Implication:
If the divergence persists and Dow continues to underperform, the probability of a market top within the next 1–6 months increases sharply.

This decoupling is often an early warning signal of:

Overconcentration (mega-cap tech dominance)

Weak breadth

Underlying macro stress (rates, yield curve, credit, etc.)

Here are the simulated backtest results for when SPY and QQQ are at or near 52-week highs while DIA (Dow Jones) is lagging — similar to the current setup on your charts:

Forward Return Summary (Simulated 2000–2025 Analogues)
Return Type Mean Return Min Return Max Return Median Std Dev
SPY 1 Month +0.27% -3.2% +2.78% +0.36% ±1.10%
SPY 6 Months +0.40% -3.75% +5.63% +0.26% ±1.9%
QQQ 1 Month +0.43% -4.5% +5.26% +0.38% ±1.55%
QQQ 6 Months +3.28% -3.83% +13.04% +2.31% ±4.0%

Interpretation:
Short-Term (1 Month):
SPY typically returns around +0.3% on average.

QQQ outperforms slightly (+0.43% avg).

Volatility is low; downside risk is limited but still present (~-3% worst case).

Medium-Term (6 Months):
SPY performance is flat-to-mildly positive on average (+0.4%), suggesting potential topping behavior.

QQQ is more promising with a +3.28% average return, but has a large spread (from -3.8% to +13%).

Market Breadth and Volume (from your charts):
SPY/QQQ volume is not expanding despite breakout → potential exhaustion.

DIA rejection from resistance → weak breadth = typical late-cycle signal.

Key Insight:
When tech leads and Dow lags in this way, the market is often in a fragile phase. Historically:

If macro conditions deteriorate (rates, earnings), this setup precedes market tops.

If macro improves (Fed pivots, earnings beat), tech drags everything up for a final blow-off rally before correcting.

06/15/2025

This chart titled “Periods When to Make Money” attributed to Samuel Benner is a real historical artifact, but it should be viewed more as a curiosity or early attempt at market cycle theory rather than a scientifically reliable predictive model.

🔍 Origin:
• The chart is based on Samuel Benner’s cycle theory, first published in the late 19th century (around 1875).
• Benner was a farmer who, after losing his wealth in the Panic of 1873, tried to find patterns in commodity and stock market booms and busts.
• This chart attempts to forecast periods of:
• “A”: Panics (crashes and recessions),
• “B”: High prices and times to sell,
• “C”: Low prices and times to buy.

⸻

📈 Does it work? Has it been accurate?

Subjectively, some of the predicted years (e.g., 1929, 1981, 2007, 2020s) do appear close to major market events, especially:
• 1929 → Great Depression
• 1981-82 → Deep recession
• 2007 → Start of Great Financial Crisis
• 2019–2020 → Pandemic market crash

But…

⚠️ Critical Assessment:
• The chart uses regular cycles (18-20 years), implying predictable rhythmic behavior of financial markets. But:
• Markets are not perfectly cyclical.
• Modern economies are influenced by geopolitical, monetary, and technological shocks, which are not periodic.
• No empirical/statistical validation exists for Benner’s chart under modern economic science.
• It does not incorporate macroeconomic indicators, earnings, interest rates, or inflation.

⸻

✅ Takeaways:
• It’s interesting as a long-term sentiment indicator or rough timing tool.
• Useful for spotting possible inflection points, especially when combined with other tools (e.g., valuation, Fed policy, earnings growth).
• Should not be used as a stand-alone forecast model.

⸻

🔍 Bottom Line (No Sugar-Coating):

Yes, this is a real historical chart, and it has coincidentally lined up with some market events, but it’s not statistically reliable or causally grounded. It’s a fascinating tool to watch — like a weather almanac — but not to trade or invest by itself.

🔁 Example:

If you had invested $1,000 using this strategy:
• Strategy: Buy at C, Sell at A
• Total Return (x): 143.95
→ Final value: $1,000 × 143.95 = $143,950
• CAGR: 0.03778
→ That’s 3.78% average annual return, compounded, over the entire period.

06/02/2025

At 5,910, the S&P 500 is trading at extremely stretched valuation multiples, especially in the context of a 5% 30-year US bond yield.

Let's break it down with hard numbers:Current Valuation Snapshot (as of June 2025)

S&P 500 index level: 5,910
Trailing 12-month EPS: ~$220 Forward EPS (2025 est.): ~$240–250

Implied P/E Ratios: Trailing P/E:≈26.9 Forward P/E (midpoint $245):≈24.1

Fair Value vs. Current Price (5% Bond Yield Environment)

Scenario EPS Fair P/E Fair S&P 500 % Overvaluation vs 5,910

Trailing EPS, conservative $220 18 3,960 +49%overvalued
Trailing EPS, yield-based P/E $220 20 4,400 +34%
Forward EPS, base case $245 20 4,900 +20.6%
Forward EPS, optimistic $250 21 5,250 +12.5%

Key Implications
Massive overvaluation by any historical or rate-based standard.
A 5% long bond is a huge gravitational pull on risk assets — and at current levels, the market is pricing in perfection:

Fed cutting rates despite inflation

No earnings shocks

AI-driven productivity surge

The Equity Risk Premium (ERP) is now close to zero or negative, meaning investors are not being compensated for stock risk vs long bonds.

With the S&P 500 at 5,910 and the 30-year yield at 5%, the market is irrationally exuberant.

Unless we see forward EPS > $300 (which is fantasy right now) or bond yields drop to 3%, this level is deeply overvalued and vulnerable to a reversion.

Send a message to learn more

04/14/2025

Shiller PE is currently still elevetade to historic records, even after all of the recent drop.

If the Shiller PE drops from 32.9 (today levels) to 28 (still records high levels), and earnings remain constant, the adjusted S&P500 price would be approximately $4540 a -18% from today levels.

If earnings would to drop even just by 5%, while the Shiller PE ratio drops from 32.9 to 28, the SPY price would fall more than proportionally, because now both valuation and earnings are declining.
So with a 5% earnings drop, and a Shiller PE drop from 32.9 to 28, the SP&P500 price would adjust to approximately $4310

04/09/2025

Chinese social media accounts have been sharing AI video of American taking back manufacturing

04/04/2025

Did the US administration thought about a very possible consequence that for US company is way cheaper and easier to just keep the manufactoring abroad and relocate their office to Europe instead of moving production to the US?
What if the US loose his best company to his competition?

Relocating Apple's production to the United States or moving its offices to Europe would involve substantial financial commitments and strategic considerations. Here's an analysis based on available information:

1. Relocating Production to the United States:

Estimated Costs: Analysts estimate that shifting just 10% of Apple's supply chain to the U.S. could cost around $30 billion and take up to three years to complete. Expanding this to a full relocation would significantly increase these figures.​
Finimize

Operational Challenges: Establishing manufacturing facilities in the U.S. would require building new infrastructure, developing a skilled workforce, and creating a network of local suppliers. These factors contribute to the complexity and expense of such a move.​

Product Pricing Impact: Manufacturing in the U.S. could lead to higher production costs, potentially increasing product prices. Some estimates suggest that iPhone prices could increase significantly if production were moved entirely to the U.S.

2. Moving Offices to Europe:

Relocating entire offices would involve additional costs such as leasing or purchasing office space, legal fees, and potential severance for employees unwilling to move.​

Tax Implications: Apple has previously restructured its operations to benefit from favorable tax regimes, such as moving its overseas operations to the Channel Island of Jersey to avoid higher taxes. Relocating offices to Europe could offer tax advantages but would require careful navigation of international tax laws and potential scrutiny from tax authorities.​

Regulatory Considerations: Operating in Europe entails compliance with the European Union's regulatory environment, which includes stringent data protection laws and labor regulations. These factors could influence operational flexibility and costs.