07/01/2026
I know it might seem a little rich for the head of a company selling flood insurance to write an article like that. Yes, he's saying more people should have flood insurance and he stands to profit from that, but the truth is in the claims data. Floods happen in much broader swathes of land that what is depicted on flood maps.
Just because you're "not in a flood zone" doesn't mean you're not at risk of being hit by the next catastrophe - which you'll face uninsured and with a floundering FEMA response.
Happy to chat with people about the cost of removing this concern from your plate. Even if you choose not to purchase insurance, you really should be aware of the risk you're choosing not to insure.
"But I'm not in a flood zone..." From the article - The claims data confirms it. My query of FEMA’s OpenFEMA database showed the National Flood Insurance Program has paid close to 700,000 claims and $21 billion in losses on properties in non-mandatory low-risk zones, from people who bought coverag...