06/01/2026
There's a provision in the Protect College Sports Act that's getting less attention than it deserves: Section 106's five-year post-eligibility medical coverage requirement.
Most of the analysis I've seen focuses on whether it passes. Fair question. But the more interesting question for athletes and families is what changes in their planning if it does.
Two things shift immediately.
First, reserve sizing and disability coverage timing during eligibility get reshaped. If your post-eligibility medical runway extends to five years, the cash buffer you need to absorb a sport-related injury looks different than it does today.
Second, and less obvious: a new planning gap appears at year five. Coverage ends right when a lot of former athletes are still mid-pivot — finishing degrees, starting careers, transitioning out of pro contracts — and least equipped to absorb out-of-pocket costs from injuries that originated years earlier.
I've been calling it the year-five cliff.
The provision itself is strong. Darren Heitner's read on it in this week's Newsletter, Image, Likeness is right. What's missing from the conversation is the downstream question every athlete's planning team should be working on now, regardless of whether the bill passes: do you treat year five as the end of a runway, or the start of a gap?
That's a different strategy conversation than "what if I get hurt." It's a longer-horizon one. It's the kind of thing my CADENCE work with athletes and their families is built to make routine instead of reactive.