06/06/2026
One of the most common things people tell me, almost word for word:
"Flynt, I like the idea of protection, but I don't want to give up the market."
Every time, I tell them the same thing.
Nobody is asking you to.
The decision in front of most folks isn't "all in on the market" versus "all out of the market." That's not the real choice. That's a story we tell ourselves because it's simpler than the real one.
The real choice is this:
Which of your dollars can you afford to lose? And which ones can't you?
Because there's a difference. The money in your portfolio that's going to fund a vacation in 2031 — that money has time. It can ride out a bad year. It can absorb a 20% drop and recover.
The money that's going to pay your mortgage next March — that money doesn't have time. That money has to show up.
What I help folks figure out is which dollars are doing which job. For most people, somewhere in the ten years around retirement, the answer ends up being something like: 40% in protected income (the dollars you actually live on), 60% in growth (the dollars that still have time).
You stay in the market. You just stop betting your grocery money on whether the market cooperates.
It's not a sexy strategy. But neither is unpacking boxes in a smaller house at 72 because the timing didn't work out.