02/09/2026
Noticed today that Tesla added self-driving semis to their website as they gear up for customer deliveries. It’s interesting to see how companies already using this technology have adjusted their insurance programs. Many of the questions stem from the ambiguity between autonomous trucking and traditional trucking. Insureds are not only curious about long-term cost effectiveness and liability parameters but are now navigating an entirely new insurance landscape, causing them to reassess coverages — including cyber, product liability, umbrella, and other related coverages.
In traditional trucking, we have a driver, we have a wreck, and we have a responsible party. In autonomous driving, there are multiple roles involved however no driver to blame.
This has led many experts to speculate that claims could increase, followed by more nuclear verdicts, with more parties being brought into them, all driven by one dangerous and still-unanswered question: Who is at fault?
Can you think of any other scenarios/parties that could make this a conundrum of claim?
Fleet operator
Software provider
Vehicle manufacturer
Remote operator
Cyber actors
Maintenance manager
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn