08/10/2020
Frustration as a ground for Revocation or non performance of Contract by either party.
LEGAL OPINION ON THE ARBITRARY SALARY CUTS THREATENED BY EMPLOYERS AFTER THE COVID19 LOCKDOWN ~ CASE STUDY; THE CHRISTINE KABASWEKE SU***DE
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
In letters addressed to the staff of Vision Group, the Human Resource Manager communicated that there will be salary deductions for the months of May, June and July.
Last week, Christine Kabasweke, an accountant with Vision Group reportedly committed su***de after she received communication that her salary would be reduced by 50% following the COVID19 crisis and lockdown.
This was an unfortunate death in the most unfortunate of the circumstances. May her soul rest in eternal peace.
First things first; s.40 of the Employment Act, 2006 provides for the duty of the employers to provide work to the employee in accordance with the contract of employment. But this duty shall not apply if the contract is frustrated among other circumstances and as thus the employer shall not be liable for failure to provide work.
At common law, the rights and obligations of the employee and the employer during the period of frustration are determined by a force majeure clause in the contract. A force majeure clause is a contractual clause that alters the parties' obligations and/or liabilities under a contract when a force majeure event occurs.
A force majeure event refers to an occurrence that is outside the reasonable control of a party and which prevents a party from performing its obligation under a contract e.g the corona virus pandemic.
Whereas it's the position at common law that employment contracts ought to contain force majeure clauses, the Employment Act, 2006(of Uganda) directly incorporates the effects of the force majuere clauses in all employment contracts under s.40.
This means that during the lockdown period, the employer has no obligation to provide work to the employee and the employee has no obligation to execute his duties under the employment contract. This further means that the employer can lawfully suspend employment contracts during the lockdown period or he or she might choose to terminate the said contracts. If the employer chooses the latter option, he has to pay all terminal benefits accruing to the affected employees.
Whereas the consent of an employee must be sought before an employer can force them to go on unpaid or paid leave, the Industrial Court has held that in exceptional circumstances like the COVID19 crisis, the employers can without the employees' consent send them on forced paid or unpaid leave.
However what the employer can't lawfully do is to unilaterally effect salary cuts by any amount except in a few cases. Section 46 of the Employment Act, 2006 provides that the employees salary or wage cannot be reduced by any amount without his or her written consent. The only exceptions to the above statement of the law are tax deductions(PAYE under s.116 of the Income Tax Act(as amended), property rates, subscriptions and contributions imposed by law(eg 5% contribution to NSSF under the NSSF Act) and union dues in accordance with s.50 of the Employment Act, 2006.
Therefore, it is our considered opinion that whereas suspension of contracts by employers could have been legal, the threatened salary cuts by Vision Group among several other employees are not; except where they wilfully consent to such deductions.
All employees except those whose contracts had been suspended during the COVID19 lockdown period are entitled to their full salary unless employers obtain their wilful written consent to reduce their salaries.
If an employer reduces your salary for any reason without your written consent, you may start by seeking further clarification from your Human Resource Manager about the deductions. If his explanation is vague and unclear, you may write to him demanding that the company(or boss) refunds the amount wrongfully deducted and ask him to desist from making any such further deductions from your salary in future.
In the alternative, you may accept this as the employer's repudiatory breach and resign. Then you can claim constructive dismissal and claim compensation for the losses occasioned by your employer's acts and/or omissions.
Employment law requires that the complaint should first be lodged with a District Labour Officer but the Industrial Court has of recent entertained labour claims that have come by ways other than reference or appeal.
Let not our employers push us to committing su***de, just drop your question, contribution & criticism in the comments section.
**********(RIP Christine Kabasweke)***********
Partner ~ Gisa & Co. Law Chambers