16/09/2026
en. It is technically serious, it is maintained, and it is given away.
Read that again. Free. Excellent. Peer-reviewed. Documented so anyone can learn from it.
So why would anyone pay for automated trading software when this exists? That question is the whole point, and there are only two ways to answer it under pressure.
One is to disparage the free tool β call it unserious, warn that open source is unsafe. That answer is a confession. It says the seller believes the value is the code, and is frightened someone gave better code away.
The other is to praise it honestly and mean it. Which is easier than it sounds, once you look at the arithmetic: if great free maintained code were what made people money, this project's release would have been the most profitable event in retail trading history. Everyone could have it tonight, for nothing. And yet most people who automate still lose. The framework does not owe anyone a strategy, a risk plan, or the discipline to stop trading a system that is quietly dying. It hands you the race car. It does not hand you the driver.
That is the most respectful thing you can say about a tool: it is so good that it exposes the truth cleanly. The edge was never in the software. It sits one layer up β in the strategy, the risk design, and the discipline the trader brings.
One thing we will state plainly so nobody is misled: we do not run on freqtrade, and this is not an endorsement to switch. It trades cryptocurrency on exchanges; our automation runs on MetaTrader 5 through brokers. Different venues, different instruments, different operating reality. It is a reference point in an argument, not a detour for our customers.
We respect the code, the nine years, and the decision to publish rather than hoard. And we respect even more the lesson it proves: free code is abundant now. Free discipline never has been.
Full essay on the site β link in bio.
π