27/11/2025
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ท๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐: ๐ฅ๐ฒ-๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฉ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ง๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ฝ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ฏ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐โฃ
โฃ
Two Tiong Bahru blocks recently missed out on the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) โ not because residents opposed it, but because they didnโt meet the 75% approval required. A few โnoโ votes โ or abstentions โ cost the entire precinct much-needed upgrades.โฃ
โฃ
This isn't just about HIP. In en bloc cases, 20% of owners can block sales supported by 80%. In both public and private housing, minority resistance often overrules majority support, causing stagnation.โฃ
โฃ
Should the rules evolve?โฃ
Is an abstained vote a clear "No"
โฃ
Proposed refinements include:โฃ
โข Reducing HIP approval from 75% to 70%โฃ
โข Lowering en bloc thresholds by 5% across categoriesโฃ
โข Introducing a maximum cap on disapproval โ e.g. if 75% say yes and less than 20% say no, the project proceeds.โฃ
โฃ
This would ensure minority voices are heard โ but not at the cost of progress.โฃ
โฃ
As estates age and infrastructure wears, policies must adapt to reflect real community intent, not just procedural hurdles.โฃ
โฃThe key question is no longer โShould we redevelop?โ but โHow do we move forward together?โโฃ
โฃ
Permanent resident households are not eligible to vote Read more at The Business Times.