Agdao Coop - Head Office

Agdao Coop - Head Office To improve the quality of life of its members through sustainable and responsive cooperative services.

27/08/2026

PUBLIC STATEMENT

The Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative informs all members, depositors, employees, stakeholders, and the public that the controversy concerning the legal right to manage and control AMPC remains unresolved and is presently before the Supreme Court.

Even though the Writ of Preliminary Injunction has been lifted, its lifting does not automatically confer authority upon the other group to take over AMPC. The lifting of an injunction is not equivalent to an affirmative order granting them possession, management, or control of the Cooperative.

Accordingly, despite the lifting of the WPI, the legal status quo must continue to be respected unless and until the Supreme Court, or a competent quasi judicial or adjudicatory body acting within its jurisdiction, issues a clear and specific directive expressly authorizing the takeover or turnover of AMPC.

Simply stated, the lifting of the WPI merely removes the injunctive restraint. It is not a takeover order. Neither does it constitute authority for any group to assume management and control of AMPC.

If a group claims a legal right to take over the Cooperative, that authority must appear in a clear, specific, and unmistakable directive from a competent tribunal. It cannot be created through private interpretation, disputed claims, unilateral declarations, or questionable documents.

AMPC has consistently exercised restraint and respect for the judicial process. Such restraint, however, must not be mistaken for weakness or consent to a unilateral takeover.

AMPC will no longer waste its institutional resources engaging in repetitive arguments with persons who deliberately refuse to respect the existing legal status quo. Any person who attempts, through force, intimidation, or self help, to occupy, seize possession of, or interfere with AMPC's offices, properties, records, personnel, branches, or operations shall be held individually accountable for his or her acts.

Where circumstances warrant, AMPC will not hesitate to seek immediate police intervention, file the appropriate criminal complaints, and pursue all remedies available under law against any person who commits an arrestable offense in an attempt to forcibly alter the existing legal status quo.

This is not a threat. It is clear notice that a disputed claim of authority cannot be enforced through force or self help while the underlying legal controversy remains subject to the proper judicial process.

The lifting of the WPI is not authority to take over. Unless and until there is a clear and unmistakable adjudicatory directive expressly authorizing a takeover, the legal status quo must be respected.

27/08/2026

PUBLIC STATEMENT

Ang Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative nagpahibalo sa tanang miyembro, depositors, empleyado, stakeholders, ug publiko nga ang isyu kung kinsa ang adunay legal nga katungod sa pagdumala ug pagkontrol sa AMPC wala pa mahuman ug anaa pa karon sa Supreme Court.

Bisan pa nga gi lift na ang Writ of Preliminary Injunction, ang lifting niini dili automatic nga naghatag og authority sa pikas grupo nga mag takeover sa AMPC. Ang pagtangtang sa injunction dili parehas sa usa ka affirmative order nga naghatag kanila og possession, management, o control sa Cooperative.

Busa, bisan lifted na ang WPI, ang legal status quo kinahanglan gihapon respetuhon hangtod adunay klaro ug specific nga directive gikan sa Supreme Court, o gikan sa competent quasi judicial o adjudicatory body nga adunay jurisdiction, nga expressly naga authorize sa takeover o turnover sa AMPC.

Sa yano nga pagkasulti, ang pag lift sa WPI nagtangtang lamang sa injunction. Dili kini takeover order. Dili usab kini authority nga sila na ang adunay katungod sa pagdumala sa AMPC.

Kung adunay legal nga katungod sa takeover, kinahanglan kini makita sa klaro, specific, ug unmistakable nga directive sa competent tribunal. Dili kini mahimong ibase lamang sa kaugalingong interpretation, disputed claims, o questionable documents.

Dugay nang nagpakita og pagpugong ug respeto sa legal process ang AMPC. Apan dili kini angay sabton nga kahuyang o pag uyon sa bisan unsang unilateral takeover.

Sugod karon, ang AMPC dili na mag usik og panahon sa balik balik nga pakiglalis sa mga tawo nga nagpili nga dili motagad sa existing legal status quo. Bisan kinsa nga mosulay pinaagi sa force, intimidation, o self help sa pag occupy, pagkuha sa possession, o pagpanghilabot sa offices, properties, records, personnel, branches, o operations sa AMPC manubag sa iyang kaugalingong binuhatan.

Kung gikinahanglan sa circumstances, ang AMPC dili magduha duha sa pagpangayo og police intervention, pagfile sa appropriate criminal complaints, ug paggamit sa tanang legal nga pamaagi aron ang bisan kinsa nga makahimo og arrestable offense maaresto ug mapanubag sumala sa balaod.

Dili kini hulga. Klaro kini nga pahibalo nga ang usa ka disputed claim of authority dili mahimong ipatuman pinaagi sa kaugalingong pwersa samtang ang maong legal controversy anaa pa sa proper judicial process.

Ang lifting sa WPI dili authority to takeover. Hangtod walay klaro ug unmistakable nga adjudicatory directive nga naga authorize sa takeover, ang legal status quo kinahanglan respetuhon.

26/08/2026

đź“Ł Mga Ka-Miyembro sa AMPC,

Gusto namong ipahibalo nga ang inyong Board of Directors nagpadayon sa paglihok alang sa interes sa atong kooperatiba ug sa tanang miyembro niini.

Human sa pagrepaso sa mga nahitabo ug sa bag-ong desisyon nga may kalabutan sa atong kooperatiba, adunay mga kausaban sa atong liderato aron mapalig-on ang maayong pagdumala, transparency, ug kalig-on sa AMPC.

Atong kasamtangang liderato:

âś… Chairman: Ruel S. Larutin
âś… Vice-Chairman: Fr. Amelio V. Salvador
âś… Board Members: Fermin A. Uy, Atty. Marvin V. Bohol, Joel B. Avorque, Eustiquio Q. Clerigo, Jr., ug Crisanto D. Baguio
âś… General Manager: Randy M. Resos

Nagpasalamat kami sa inyong padayon nga pagsalig ug suporta. Magtinabangay kita sa pagpalig-on sa atong kooperatiba alang sa kaayohan sa tanang miyembro.

"To improve the quality of life of its members."

26/08/2026

OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO ALL AMPC MEMBERS

To All Members of Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative (AMPC):

The incumbent Board of Directors of Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative (AMPC) and Management wishes to inform all members that it continues to recognize and respect the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) as the government agency mandated by law to regulate, supervise, and promote the development of cooperatives in the Philippines.

The Board has taken due notice of the recent Decision issued by the CDA involving certain former and current officers of the Cooperative. While the matters discussed in the Decision relate to transactions and actions undertaken in 2021 under a previous administration, the present Board believes that responsible governance requires careful consideration of the Authority's findings and their implications for the Cooperative today.

In line with this commitment, the Board reviewed the relevant findings during its meeting on August 24, 2026. Following these discussions, Directors Romeo Fabian and Antonio Dela Cruz submitted their resignations, which were accepted by the Board. Likewise, General Manager Michael John Gestopa voluntarily and willingly relinquished his position to facilitate an orderly management transition and in the best interest of the Cooperative. The Board accepted this manifestation while recognizing that such action does not necessarily constitute agreement with or admission of the findings concerning him.

These decisions were guided by the Board's commitment to accountability, transparency, institutional stability, and sound cooperative governance. More importantly, they reflect our responsibility to protect the interests of the Cooperative and its members while maintaining constructive engagement with the CDA and other relevant institutions.

At the same time, the Cooperative fully recognizes and respects the rights of the individuals concerned to pursue any legal remedies available under the law, including the right to seek review or challenge the Decision through the appropriate legal processes.

The Board assures all members that AMPC remains focused on safeguarding the Cooperative, strengthening its operations, and ensuring continuity of services. We remain committed to working constructively with the CDA and all stakeholders in pursuit of good governance, lawful processes, and the long-term welfare of our members.

As part of ensuring stability and continuity in the Cooperative's operations, the following officers currently comprise the leadership of AMPC:

Board of Directors
• Chairman: Ruel S. Larutin
• Vice-Chairman: Fr. Amelio V. Salvador
• Directors:
o Fermin A. Uy
o Atty. Marvin V. Bohol
o Joel B. Avorque
o Eustiquio Q. Clerigo, Jr.
o Crisanto D. Baguio

Management
• General Manager: Randy M. Resos

We kindly ask for your continued trust, cooperation, and support as we move forward together in strengthening our Cooperative and fulfilling our mission:

"To improve the quality of life of its members."

For and on behalf of the Board of Directors
Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative (AMPC)

26/08/2026

Among gidapit ang tanang miyembro sa Agdao Multipurpose Cooperative (AMPC) sa pagpaminaw sa pamahayag sa atong bag-ong natudlong General Manager nga si Randy Resos, sa atong Chairman of the Board nga si Chairman Ruel Larutin, ug sa abogado sa atong kooperatiba nga si Atty. Gibb Andrew Cabahug, nga ilang gipadayag human sa ilang gipahigayon nga press conference.

Importante nga kita isip mga miyembro makadawat ug tukma ug tinuod nga impormasyon aron magpabiling nahibal-an sa mga dagan ug mga lakang nga ginahimo alang sa atong kooperatiba. Daghang salamat sa inyong padayon nga pagsalig ug suporta sa AMPC.

Credits to Sir Sammy Baug for the video interview.

21/08/2026

PUBLIC STATEMENT TO ALL AMPC MEMBERS


AMPC is issuing this statement to clarify the effect of the recent Decision of CDA Region XI in Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11 (Cristobal, et al. vs. Albin O. Respuesto, et al.), involving charges for alleged violation of Article 45 of Republic Act No. 9520, grave abuse of authority, and grave misconduct and inefficiency under the CDA Omnibus Rules of Procedure.


Reports have reached AMPC that the former Interim Board of Directors is invoking the July 20, 2026 Decision as supposed authority to again take control of the AMPC Head Office.

The Decision does not give them that authority.

Members deserve to know what the Decision actually says and, just as importantly, what it does NOT say.

THE DECISION DOES NOT ORDER A TAKEOVER OF AMPC
The most important point is also the simplest: THE JULY 20, 2026 DECISION DOES NOT ORDER THE FORMER INTERIM BOD TO TAKE OVER AMPC.

It does not reinstate the former Interim BOD. It does not appoint its members as the present Board of Directors. It does not direct AMPC's present officers or employees to surrender the Head Office. It does not authorize anyone to enter AMPC offices, seize records or property, take control of bank accounts, or assume control of AMPC's operations.

A finding of administrative liability against former officers (the Respuesto-led BOD) is one thing; legal authority to take possession and control of a cooperative is an entirely different matter.

No person or group should therefore represent the July 20, 2026 Decision to AMPC members, employees, banks, government agencies, or law-enforcement authorities as though it were an order transferring control of AMPC to the former Interim BOD.

AMPC members are accordingly urged to be vigilant against any attempt to distort the Decision or use it to solicit support for another so-called “member power” intended to sow chaos or justify a physical or operational takeover of the Cooperative.

CDA ITSELF RECOGNIZES THAT THE PENALTIES UNDER ITS LATER RULES CANNOT SIMPLY BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY


The Decision also recognizes an important limitation. The acts attributed to the former AMPC directors occurred before the CDA Omnibus Rules of Procedure took effect on December 17, 2022.

CDA itself recognizes that the provisions imposing penalties for grave offenses cannot simply be applied retroactively to acts committed before those Rules took effect.

This is not a new position. CDA had previously acknowledged in proceedings involving AMPC that its Omnibus Rules became effective only on December 17, 2022 and that, because of the punitive consequences involved, their retroactive application would not be appropriate.

Whatever administrative findings the July 20, 2026 Decision may contain, those findings cannot be enlarged into a penalty or consequence that the law does not permit. Much less can they be converted into authority for a former Interim BOD to physically take possession of AMPC.

A finding of liability is not a writ of ex*****on. It is not an order of takeover.


THE DECISION DOES NOT REINSTATE THE FORMER INTERIM BOD


There is another important fact in the Decision itself.

The Decision takes notice of the fact that during the August 18, 2024 Special Representative Assembly, the Representative Assembly purportedly terminated the term of the 2024 Incumbent BOD and declared all positions vacant.


The Decision then states: “Hence, the issue of whether the Respondents shall be removed or not may not be belabored upon in light of this supervening event.”

Whatever the legal consequences of that statement may ultimately be, one thing is plain: The July 20, 2026 Decision does not reinstate the former Interim BOD.

It does not say that its former members are now the incumbent directors of AMPC. It does not give them a new term of office.

And it does not authorize them to take possession of the Head Office.

The former Interim BOD cannot obtain from silence what the dispositive portion of the Decision does not specifically grant.

THE DECISION DOES NOT MEAN THAT CDA HAS BEEN JUDICIALLY DECLARED CORRECT IN THE PENDING SUPREME COURT CASE


Members should also understand that Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11 and the case now pending before the Supreme Court are not the same case.

The July 20, 2026 administrative Decision concerns charges arising from the Diamond Insurance controversy and the alleged administrative liability of the ALBIN O. RESPUESTO-LED BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS GENERAL MANAGER.

The case pending before the Supreme Court concerns a different question: whether CDA acted lawfully and within its jurisdiction in connection with the 2024 Special Representative Assembly and the actions that followed from it. Among the matters being challenged is CDA's involvement in the August 18, 2024 SRA, where matters beyond the stated purpose of the assembly were taken up, including the purported termination of the Dela Cruz-led Board and the events that led to the creation of the Interim BOD.

The July 20, 2026 Decision does not decide that Supreme Court case.

CDA cannot settle the judicial challenge to its own actions simply by expressing its own position in another administrative proceeding.

CDA is a party before the Supreme Court. It is not the court deciding the case.

THE SUPREME COURT CASE REMAINS A SEPARATE JUDICIAL PROCEEDING


The controversy involving CDA's actions has been elevated to the Supreme Court in G.R. No. E-05369.

The administrative Decision in Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11 does not, by itself, authorize CDA or the former Interim BOD to declare that Supreme Court proceeding moot or finished.


Whether the pending Petition has become moot, whether CDA acted within its lawful authority, and what legal consequences should follow are matters for the Supreme Court to determine.


Until then, no party should present its own interpretation of the July 20, 2026 Decision as though the Supreme Court had already ruled.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR AMPC MEMBERS
The situation can therefore be stated simply:

ĂĽ The July 20, 2026 Decision is not an order directing the former Interim BOD to take over AMPC.

ĂĽ It does not reinstate the former Interim BOD.

ĂĽ It does not authorize the seizure of the AMPC Head Office, branches, records, bank accounts, properties, or operations.

ĂĽ It does not decide the case presently pending before the Supreme Court.

ĂĽ And it cannot be given consequences that its own dispositive portion does not provide.

AMPC respects the lawful processes of the Cooperative Development Authority and all other government institutions. The Cooperative will likewise avail itself of the remedies provided by law with respect to administrative decisions with which it disagrees.


But respect for lawful government process works both ways. An administrative Decision must be read for what it actually orders, not for what any interested group wishes it had ordered.

AMPC therefore calls upon all members, officers, employees, and concerned parties to remain calm and vigilant. The July 20, 2026 Decision should not be exaggerated, distorted, or used as a pretext for another unauthorized physical or operational takeover of the Cooperative.

Any change in possession or control of AMPC must proceed through lawful authority and lawful process, not through force, numbers, threats, or destruction of private property.


AGDAO MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE

21/08/2026

PAMPUBLIKONG PAHAYAG ALANG SA TANANG MIYEMBRO SA AMPC


Ang AMPC nagpagawas niini nga pahayag aron klarohon ang epekto sa bag-uhay nga Desisyon sa CDA Region XI sa Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11 (Cristobal, et al. vs. Albin O. Respuesto, et al.), nga may kalabotan sa mga sumbong sa giingong paglapas sa Article 45 sa Republic Act No. 9520, grave abuse of authority, ug grave misconduct ug inefficiency ubos sa CDA Omnibus Rules of Procedure.

Nakaabot sa AMPC ang mga report nga ang kanhing Interim Board of Directors nagpasandig sa Desisyon nga gipetsahan Hulyo 20, 2026 isip kuno awtoridad aron makabalik ug makakontrol sa AMPC Head Office.

Ang maong Desisyon wala naghatag kanila niana nga awtoridad. Ang mga miyembro angay makahibalo kung unsa gyud ang giingon sa Desisyon ug, labaw sa tanan, kung unsa ang DILI niini giingon.

ANG DESISYON DILI NAGMANDO NGA KUHAON ANG KONTROL SA AMPC
Ang labing importante nga punto mao usab ang pinakasayon: ANG DESISYON SA HULYO 20, 2026 DILI NAGMANDO NGA ANG KANHING INTERIM BOD MAOY MOKUHA UG KONTROL SA AMPC.

Dili niini ibalik sa katungdanan ang kanhing Interim BOD. Dili niini itudlo ang ilang mga miyembro isip kasamtangang Board of Directors. Dili niini sugoon ang kasamtangang mga opisyal o empleyado sa AMPC nga itugyan ang Head Office. Dili usab niini awtorisahan ang bisan kinsa nga mosulod sa mga opisina sa AMPC, mangilog sa mga rekord o kabtangan, mokontrol sa mga bank account, o mopuli sa pagdumala sa operasyon sa AMPC.

Ang pagkakaplag og administrative liability batok sa kanhing mga opisyal (ang Respuesto-led BOD) usa ka butang; ang legal nga awtoridad sa pagkuha sa possession ug control sa usa ka kooperatiba lahi gayud nga butang.

Busa, walay tawo o grupo nga angay magrepresentar sa Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 ngadto sa mga miyembro sa AMPC, empleyado, bangko, government agencies, o law-enforcement authorities nga daw kini usa ka mando nga nagbalhin sa kontrol sa AMPC ngadto sa kanhing Interim BOD.

Ang mga miyembro sa AMPC giawhag nga magmatngon batok sa bisan unsang pagsulay sa pagbaluktot sa Desisyon o paggamit niini aron mangayo og suporta alang sa laing gitawag nga “member power” nga mahimong mosabwag og kagubot o gamiton nga rason alang sa pisikal o operational takeover sa Kooperatiba.

GIILA MISMO SA CDA NGA ANG MGA PENALTY UBOS SA ULAHING MGA RULES DILI DAYON MAAPLIKAR RETROACTIVELY
Giila usab sa Desisyon ang usa ka importanteng limitasyon. Ang mga buhat nga gipasangil sa kanhing mga direktor sa AMPC nahitabo sa wala pa mahimong epektibo ang CDA Omnibus Rules of Procedure niadtong Disyembre 17, 2022.

Giila mismo sa CDA nga ang mga probisyon nga nagpahamtang og penalties alang sa grave offenses dili basta-basta mahimong i-retroactively apply sa mga buhat nga nahitabo sa wala pa kini nga Rules mahimong epektibo.

Dili kini bag-ong posisyon. Ang CDA kaniadto pa miila sa mga proceedings nga may kalabotan sa AMPC nga ang iyang Omnibus Rules nahimong epektibo lamang niadtong Disyembre 17, 2022 ug nga, tungod sa punitive consequences nga nalambigit, dili angay ang retroactive application niini.

Bisan unsa pa ang administrative findings nga anaa sa Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026, dili kini mahimong palapdan ngadto sa penalty o consequence nga wala gitugot sa balaod. Labaw pa, dili kini mahimong himuong awtoridad alang sa kanhing Interim BOD aron pisikal nga kuhaon ang possession sa AMPC.

Ang finding of liability dili writ of ex*****on. Dili kini order of takeover.


ANG DESISYON DILI NAGBALIK SA KANHING INTERIM BOD
Aduna pay laing importanteng kamatuoran nga makita mismo sa Desisyon.

Gihisgutan sa Desisyon ang kamatuoran nga atol sa August 18, 2024 Special Representative Assembly, ang Representative Assembly kuno mitapos sa termino sa 2024 Incumbent BOD ug mipahayag nga bakante ang tanang posisyon.

Dayon giingon sa Desisyon: “Hence, the issue of whether the Respondents shall be removed or not may not be belabored upon in light of this supervening event.”

Bisan unsa pa ang mahimong legal nga epekto sa maong pahayag sa umaabot, usa ka butang ang klaro: Ang Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 dili nagbalik sa kanhing Interim BOD.

Dili niini giingon nga ang ilang kanhing mga miyembro mao na karon ang incumbent directors sa AMPC. Dili niini hatagan sila og bag-ong termino sa katungdanan. Ug dili niini awtorisahan sila sa pagkuha sa Head Office.

Ang kanhing Interim BOD dili makakuha gikan sa kahilom sa Desisyon og usa ka butang nga wala espesipikong gihatag sa dispositive portion niini.

ANG DESISYON DILI PASABOT NGA GIPAMATUD-AN NA SA KORTE NGA HUSTO ANG CDA SA NAGPADAYON NGA SUPREME COURT CASE
Kinahanglan sab masabtan sa mga miyembro nga ang Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11 ug ang kaso nga karon pending sa Supreme Court dili parehas nga kaso.

Ang administrative Decision sa Hulyo 20, 2026 may kalabotan sa mga sumbong nga mitumaw sa Diamond Insurance controversy ug sa giingong administrative liability sa ALBIN O. RESPUESTO-LED BOARD OF DIRECTORS ug sa ilang General Manager.

Ang kaso nga pending sa Supreme Court lahi nga pangutana: kung ang CDA ba milihok subay sa balaod ug sulod sa iyang jurisdiction may kalabotan sa 2024 Special Representative Assembly ug sa mga aksyon nga misunod niini.

Lakip sa mga gihagit mao ang pag-apil sa CDA sa August 18, 2024 SRA, diin gihisgutan ang mga butang nga lapas sa gipahayag nga katuyoan sa assembly, lakip ang giingong pagtapos sa Dela Cruz-led Board ug ang mga panghitabo nga mitultol sa pagkaporma sa Interim BOD.

Ang Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 wala magdesisyon sa maong kaso sa Supreme Court. Dili masulbad sa CDA ang judicial challenge batok sa kaugalingon niyang mga aksyon pinaagi lamang sa pagpahayag sa kaugalingon niyang posisyon sa laing administrative proceeding.

Ang CDA usa ka partido atubangan sa Supreme Court. Dili kini ang korte nga nagdesisyon sa maong kaso.

ANG KASO SA SUPREME COURT USA KA BULAG NGA JUDICIAL PROCEEDING NGA NAGPADAYON
Ang kontrobersiya bahin sa mga aksyon sa CDA nadala ngadto sa Supreme Court pinaagi sa G.R. No. E-05369.

Ang administrative Decision sa Case No. ADJ-002-2024-R11, sa iyang kaugalingon, dili maghatag og awtoridad sa CDA o sa kanhing Interim BOD nga ipahayag nga moot o nahuman na ang maong Supreme Court proceeding.

Kung ang pending Petition nahimong moot na ba, kung ang CDA ba milihok sulod sa iyang legal nga awtoridad, ug unsa ang legal nga mga sangputanan nga angay sundon, mao kini ang mga butang nga Supreme Court ang motino.

Hangtod nga mahitabo kana, walay partido nga angay magpresentar sa iyang kaugalingong interpretasyon sa Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 nga daw nakadesisyon na daan ang Supreme Court.

UNSA ANG PASABOT NIINI ALANG SA MGA MIYEMBRO SA AMPC
âś“ Ang Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 dili order nga nagmando sa kanhing Interim BOD nga kuhaon angkontrol sa AMPC.

âś“ Dili niini ibalik sa katungdanan ang kanhing Interim BOD.

âś“ Dili niini awtorisahan ang pagkuha o pagsakmit sa AMPC Head Office, branches, records, bankaccounts, properties, o operations.

âś“ Dili niini desisyunan ang kaso nga kasamtangang pending sa Supreme Court.

âś“ Ug dili kini mahimong hatagan og mga legal nga sangputanan nga wala gihatag sa kaugalingongdispositive portion niini.

Girespeto sa AMPC ang legal nga mga proseso sa Cooperative Development Authority ug sa tanang ubang government institutions. Ang Kooperatiba usab mogamit sa mga legal nga remedyo nga gitugot sa balaod may kalabotan sa mga administrative decisions nga dili niini uyonan.

Apan ang pagtahod sa lawful government process kinahanglan pareho sa duha ka bahin. Ang usa ka administrative Decision kinahanglan basahon sumala sa aktuwal nga gi-order niini, dili sumala sa gusto sa bisan unsang interesadong grupo nga unta mao ang gi-order niini.

Busa, ang AMPC nanawagan sa tanang miyembro, opisyal, empleyado, ug mga concerned parties nga magpabiling kalmado ug alerto. Ang Desisyon sa Hulyo 20, 2026 dili angay pasobrahan, baluktoton, o gamiton isip pretext alang sa laing unauthorized physical o operational takeover sa Kooperatiba.

Ang bisan unsang pagbag-o sa possession o control sa AMPC kinahanglan moagi sa legal nga awtoridad ug legal nga proseso, dili pinaagi sa pwersa, kadaghanan sa tawo, hulga, o pagdaot sa pribadong kabtangan.



AGDAO MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE

To our valued AMPC Members, Please be advised that all AGDAO COOP offices will be closed on May 27, 2026, in observance ...
26/05/2026

To our valued AMPC Members,

Please be advised that all AGDAO COOP offices will be closed on May 27, 2026, in observance of Eid'l Adha (Feast of Sacrifice), pursuant to Proclamation No. 1264.

Regular office operations will resume on May 28, 2026 (Thursday).

Thank you for your continued support and have a meaningful holiday!

19/05/2026

NOTICE TO ALL AMPC MEMBERS

Due to the extreme rainfall last night, several of our staff members were affected by flooding in their homes and are unable to report for work today. As a result, some of our branches in Davao City are temporarily closed.

We ask for your understanding and patience as we prioritize the safety and well-being of our employees during this situation. Further updates will be announced once operations normalize.

Thank you for your understanding and keep safe everyone.

Address

N. Torres Street Cor. P. Urduja Ext. , Brgy. Paciano Bangoy
Davao City
8000

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Agdao Coop - Head Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category