¿Qué es el sitio web?

https://www.facebook.com/104690002456260/

Bull Theory

📲 Join our community: https://t.me/ashcalls

08/04/2026

BREAKING: The US government just created the first official banking rules for stablecoins.

The FDIC today approved a full regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act. Here is what it means:

Every stablecoin must be backed 1:1 with real assets. If there are $1 billion worth of stablecoins in circulation, the issuer must hold $1 billion in actual reserves without any exceptions.

Every stablecoin must be redeemable on demand at face value. If you hold $100 in stablecoins, you can always get $100 back.

Reserve assets cannot be rehypothecated or reused. The reserves must sit fully segregated and cannot be used for any other financial activity.

Stablecoin issuers cannot pay interest or yield to holders simply for holding the coin. This directly affects yield bearing stablecoin products currently in the market.

If redemption requests exceed 10% of all outstanding stablecoins within a single 24-hour period, it triggers a significant redemption event requiring immediate action.

Stablecoin issuers must meet capital requirements and risk management standards similar to what banks follow. Quarterly reporting and CEO signed audits are required. Banks that hold or manage stablecoins on behalf of customers fall under the same rules.

One important clarification. FDIC insurance covers the issuer's reserve deposits at the bank level, not individual token holders.

Why this is good for crypto?

Right now stablecoins operate in a gray area. No clear rules means no trust from institutions, no trust from regulators, and no certainty for users. These rules change that. Regulated stablecoins backed by real reserves and covered by FDIC insurance become as safe as a bank deposit.

That opens the door for banks, pension funds, and large institutions to use stablecoins without legal risk. A regulated stablecoin market is the foundation that the rest of crypto needs to grow.

30/03/2026

BREAKING: Bitcoin dumped -$1,700 from $66,710 to $65,000 and liquidated over $185 million worth of longs in 60 MINUTES.

But then it pumped +$1,400 from $65,000 to $66,400 in 15 MINUTES and liquidated nearly $14 million worth of shorts.

All this happened in the last 75 minutes.

This is another example of manipulation on the low-liquidity weekend to wiped out both leveraged longs and shorts.

17/03/2026

BREAKING: Bitcoin is up 21% in the last 21 days.

BTC jumped +$13,500 since Jane Street was sued and amid the US-Iran conflict.

BTC Net Inflow: +$2.38 BILLION
ETH Net Inflow: +$334 MILLION

Total crypto market added nearly $400 billion, while gold and silver erased $2.4 trillion.

Crypto is showing insane strength in times of crisis.

01/03/2026

This is absolutely WILD.

Trump started a war with Iran at night when the American people went to sleep and killed their supreme leader before they woke up in the morning.

No approvals,
no congressional voting,
He just went for it.

First Maduro, Then El Mencho now
Ali Khamenei in just first 60 days of 2026.

20/02/2026

🚨 THE WHITE HOUSE HAS SET A MARCH 1 DEADLINE TO MOVE THE CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE BILL FORWARD.

The core issue has now been decided, and it goes against crypto firms and stablecoin holders: no yield on idle balances.

Today’s meeting was led directly by the White House, which brought draft text and controlled the discussion. Coinbase, Ripple, a16z, and crypto trade groups attended. Banks were represented through national banking associations.

The draft makes it clear that firms will not be allowed to offer rewards simply for holding stablecoins. The savings account style yield model is effectively off the table.

The debate has narrowed to whether rewards can be allowed only when tied to specific activities such as lending or other structured use.

The draft also gives the SEC, Treasury, and CFTC the power to enforce the ban on idle stablecoin yield, with penalties of up to $500,000 per violation per day.

Banks are still pushing for a deposit outflow study to examine whether payment stablecoins could reduce traditional bank deposits.

However, the broader market structure bill is still viewed as positive for crypto overall.

It aims to create clearer rules around custody, exchange oversight, token classification, and the roles of the SEC and CFTC. A formal framework would reduce regulatory uncertainty that has limited institutional participation.

For crypto firms, clarity on what is allowed and what is not could unlock more long term capital, even if certain yield models are restricted.

Talks will continue this week, and an end of month agreement is realistic.

After that, a formal framework could be ready by March 1, and the bill would move to the next stage.

20/02/2026

🇺🇸 The White House is pushing banks to agree to stablecoin rewards and advance the crypto market structure bill by March 1.

09/02/2026

🚨 IS KEVIN WARSH ABOUT TO FLOOD MARKETS WITH LIQUIDITY OR TRIGGER A BOND MARKET RISK?

Recently, the upcoming Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has called for a new FED TREASURY ACCORD, basically a framework that would decide how the Fed and the U.S Treasury work together on debt, money printing, and interest rates.

This is not only about rate cuts.

Yes, markets expect Warsh to support rate cuts over time, possibly bringing rates down toward the 2.75%–3.0% range.

But the bigger story is what happens behind the scenes.

Warsh has long argued that the Fed’s massive balance sheet, built through years of bond buying pulls the central bank too deep into government financing.

So his plan could involve:

- The Fed holding more short term Treasury bills instead of long term bonds.

- A smaller overall balance sheet.

- Limits on when large bond buying programs can happen.

- Closer coordination with the Treasury on debt issuance.

And this is where history matters. Because the U.S. has already done something very similar before. During World War II, government debt exploded from about $48 billion to over $260 billion in just six years. To manage borrowing costs, the Fed stepped in and controlled interest rates directly.

Short-term yields were fixed near 0.375% and Long-term yields were capped near 2.5%.

If yields tried to rise, the Fed printed money and bought bonds to push them back down. This policy is known as Yield Curve Control. It helped the government borrow cheaply during the war.

But it came with consequences.

Once wartime controls ended, inflation surged sharply. Real interest rates turned negative. And the Fed lost independence over monetary policy. By 1951, the system broke down and the famous Treasury Fed Accord ended yield caps.

Now fast forward to today.

U.S. debt levels are again near World War II levels relative to the economy. Interest payments alone are approaching $1 trillion per year. Even a small drop in long term yields would save the government tens of billions in financing costs. That fiscal pressure is why Warsh’s proposal is getting so much attention.

Other countries also tried something similar.

- Japan ran yield curve control from 2016 to 2024.

Its central bank ended up owning more than 50% of government bonds. Yields stayed low, but the yen weakened and bond market liquidity suffered.

- Australia tried a smaller version in 2020–2021.

When inflation surged, they were forced into a messy exit that hurt central bank credibility.

Across all these cases, the pattern was similar:

Borrowing costs stayed low. Liquidity stayed high. Currencies weakened. Exits were difficult.

If Warsh’s framework leads to lower real yields, rate cuts, and easier liquidity conditions, that usually supports risk assets like equities, gold, and crypto.

Because when bond returns fall, capital looks for higher-return alternatives. But bonds themselves could face volatility.

Less Fed support for long term yields combined with heavy Treasury issuance could steepen the yield curve and push term premiums higher and that's why this could become the most important structural shift in U.S. monetary policy since the 1940s yield curve control era.

03/02/2026

MASSIVE reversal.

Gold is up 11% from its bottom and now back above $4,880 adding $3.07 trillion in 30 hours.

Silver is up almost 20% from its bottom and now back above $85.5, adding $800 billion in just 30 hours.

That’s nearly $4 trillion recovered in 30 hours, roughly 35% of the recent $11 Trillion wipeout.

31/01/2026

🚨BREAKING: Bitcoin just dumped $2,200 in 45 MINUTES and hit a new yearly low of $80.8k

$381 million in longs were liquidated and over $70 billion wiped out from the crypto market in 60 MINUTES without any news.

A classic case of liquidation hunting on low-liquidity weekend.

31/01/2026

🚨THE SILVER MARKET IS BEING HEAVILY MANIPULATED RIGHT NOW.

Silver is trading at two completely different prices at the same time.

In the US (COMEX), silver is around $92. In Shanghai, physical silver is around $130. That’s a 40%+ premium in Shanghai.

Same metal. Two prices. And this gap is exactly what manipulation looks like.

Here’s why:

1. COMEX IS MOSTLY A PAPER MARKET

In the US, silver trading is dominated by paper contracts. Most of the volume is not real silver moving around. It’s contracts being bought and sold. And the paper to physical ratio is estimated around 350:1. That means for every 1 real ounce, there can be hundreds of paper claims.

So when big players dump paper contracts, the price drops even if physical silver is still tight. No actual silver needs to be sold.

They just sell paper and push the price down.

2) SMM AND SHANGHAI REFLECT REAL PHYSICAL DEMAND

SMM prices reflect actual physical transactions inside China. Silver holding around $120 there already shows stress. Shanghai spot prices near $130 show something even clearer: buyers are paying up because they need physical silver now.

These premiums appear when supply is tight, delivery matters, contracts are not enough. Shanghai is not pricing paper leverage. It is pricing availability.

Where paper dominates, silver prices are suppressed. Where physical demand dominates, silver trades much higher.

COMEX shows a paper price. SMM and Shanghai show the physical price.

The gap between them is proof that silver prices are being heavily influenced by paper trading, while the real market is already clearing much higher.

Dirección

UAE Dubai
Medellín De Bravo

Teléfono

+573126847610

Página web

facebook.com

Notificaciones

Sé el primero en enterarse y déjanos enviarle un correo electrónico cuando Bull Theory publique noticias y promociones. Su dirección de correo electrónico no se utilizará para ningún otro fin, y puede darse de baja en cualquier momento.