Global Environmental Partners Ltd

Global Environmental Partners Ltd Environmental Partners are a multilingual team of advisors, traders, marketers, journalist and PR/CS

Environmental Partners are a multilingual team of advisors, traders, marketers, journalist and PR/CSR experts . The company provides access to global environmental markets and products. We are in the process of building a media outlet to capture the industry development and act as a voice of the market.

03/09/2026

The sustainability challenge is shifting from intent to impact.

Many organisations now have sustainability commitments, policies and ambitions. The harder task is translating those commitments into measurable business outcomes.

BDO’s Sustainability Survey 2026 draws on insights from 251 sustainability professionals and C-suite leaders across 41 countries. Its findings point to growing maturity in governance, stakeholder engagement and organisational structures, while also highlighting the continuing difficulty of embedding sustainability into strategy, decision-making and performance measurement.

This is a critical issue for organisations of every size.

Progress depends on moving beyond isolated initiatives and connecting sustainability to the way a business actually operates:

Clear leadership accountability

Decision-useful data and performance indicators

Defined roles across finance, operations, procurement and risk

Supplier engagement and value-chain visibility

Capital allocation aligned with transition and resilience priorities

Transparent reporting on outcomes, not only commitments

Sustainability delivers the greatest value when it is integrated into core business management. It can help organisations reduce risk, improve efficiency, respond to regulation, build stakeholder trust and identify opportunities in the transition to a lower-carbon and more resource-efficient economy.

Read the BDO Sustainability Survey 2026:
https://www.bdo.nl/en-gb/insights/from-intent-to-impact-bdo-sustainability-survey-2026

03/09/2026

Nature is not a peripheral environmental issue. It is economic infrastructure.

Healthy ecosystems underpin food production, clean water, flood protection, climate resilience, biodiversity, public health and the long-term stability of supply chains.

That is why the growing call for Europe to treat nature as economic infrastructure matters. Nature loss creates real financial and operational risks for companies, investors, governments and communities. A landscape may look greener after a disturbance, but rebuilding the carbon, biodiversity and resilience once held within an ecosystem can take decades.

For business, the implication is increasingly clear: nature should be integrated into risk management, site planning, supply-chain strategy, capital allocation and sustainability reporting.

This does not mean treating nature as a simple offset. It means understanding dependencies and impacts, investing in restoration where appropriate, avoiding avoidable damage and making resilience part of commercial decision-making.

A nature-positive economy is not separate from economic growth. It is a foundation for more resilient infrastructure, productive land, secure water systems and stronger communities.

Read more from Sustainable Views:
https://www.sustainableviews.com/europe-must-treat-nature-as-economic-infrastructure-d7f613ca/

03/09/2026

Europe’s sustainability reset should not become a reason to slow down.

Regulatory simplification may reduce elements of the sustainability reporting burden, but it does not reduce the underlying business risks created by climate change, resource dependency, supply-chain disruption, biodiversity loss and changing stakeholder expectations.

The latest discussion around Europe’s sustainability “reset” is an important reminder for business leaders: compliance is only one part of sustainability strategy.

Even where reporting requirements are narrowed or timelines change, organisations still need credible visibility of:

Greenhouse-gas emissions across operations and value chains

Climate, nature and resource-related risks

Supplier exposure and resilience

Material sustainability impacts

The commercial opportunities created by efficiency, innovation and transition planning

The most resilient companies will not treat simplified disclosure requirements as a signal to pause. They will use the space to improve data quality, embed sustainability into decision-making and build practical transition plans that support long-term competitiveness.

At Global Environmental Partners, we believe sustainability should be viewed not only as a reporting exercise, but as a strategic framework for resilience, operational performance, investment readiness and value creation.

Read more from ESG Today:
https://www.esgtoday.com/europes-sustainability-reset-simplification-is-not-a-reason-to-slow-down/

03/09/2026

Carbon removal purchasing is becoming a boardroom, procurement and risk-management issue — not simply a climate-commitment headline.

A new Carbon Business Council series on CDR buyer profiles points to a more mature market. Corporate buyers are increasingly building portfolios across land, rock, air and water-based removals, weighing durability against cost, co-benefits, delivery timelines and supplier risk.

The most important shift may be this: buyers are focusing not only on the quality of a carbon removal pathway, but also on whether a supplier can deliver at the scale and timetable promised.

For organisations developing a CDR strategy, five priorities stand out:

Keep emissions reductions at the centre of the transition plan

Use removals for a clearly defined role, including residual emissions

Assess durability, measurement and verification rigorously

Evaluate commercial readiness as carefully as carbon quality

Communicate clearly about delivered, contracted and planned removals

The winners in this market will not be those making the loudest



announcements. They will be those building transparent, diversified and credible procurement strategies.

Read the full article: https://bsustainable.today/articles/carbon-removal-buyers-are-moving-from-pledges-to-procurement-what-the-new-cdr-buyer-profiles-reveal

03/09/2026

UK CBAM is no longer just a policy discussion. Importers of carbon-intensive goods need to prepare for a new compliance, data and supply-chain challenge before the mechanism takes effect in January 2027.

The UK has published a provisional list of overseas carbon-pricing systems that may qualify for carbon price relief under CBAM. The list includes the EU ETS, Montenegro’s emissions trading scheme and Serbia’s carbon tax.

But the key message for businesses is this: recognition of a country’s carbon-pricing scheme does not automatically remove UK CBAM liability.

Importers will still need to demonstrate:

The embodied emissions in imported goods

The production installation and relevant supply-chain data

The carbon price effectively paid overseas

Any free allocation, rebates, refunds or compensation

Verification documents and evidence supporting the calculation

This makes CBAM a procurement and supply-chain governance issue as much as a tax issue.

Companies should start mapping exposed imports, engaging suppliers and building a clear data trail now — not when the first filing deadline approaches.

Read the full article: https://bsustainable.today/articles/uk-cbam-recognises-serbian-and-montenegrin-carbon-pricing-what-importers-need-to-prepare-for

02/09/2026

Who governs the standards behind corporate climate targets and sustainability reporting?

As voluntary standards increasingly shape business strategy, investor expectations and regulatory discussions, good governance becomes essential.

Oxford research finds greater alignment between voluntary climate standards, but also underlines why accountability, transparency and robust decision-making are critical as standard-setting bodies become more influential.

Read more:
https://netzeroclimate.org/optimism-aligned-net-zero-standards/

02/09/2026

How long should a carbon credit last?

A new debate in Australia raises an important question for carbon markets everywhere: can short-duration carbon credits be used to address emissions that have long-term climate consequences?

The issue is not whether nature-based projects are valuable—they can deliver important climate, biodiversity and community benefits. The issue is whether buyers and policymakers are being sufficiently transparent about permanence, reversal risk and the claims attached to credits.

Read the AFR coverage:
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/climate-authority-questions-viability-of-short-term-carbon-credits-20260901-p60t9g

02/09/2026

Reducing Scope 3 emissions starts with better supplier data.

P&G is working through WBCSD’s Partnership for Carbon Transparency to collect standardised product-carbon-footprint data from suppliers. More than 100 suppliers have joined its current campaign.

This is an important example of the direction of travel for corporate sustainability: businesses need better data exchange across supply chains so procurement and product teams can make lower-carbon decisions.

Read more:
https://www.wbcsd.org/news/pg-building-a-supply-of-low-carbon-raw-materials-to-better-serve-consumers/

02/09/2026

Carbon pricing now covers almost one-third of global greenhouse-gas emissions.

The World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026 reports that 87 carbon-pricing policies are now operating worldwide, generating more than $107 billion in public revenues in 2025.

For businesses and investors, carbon pricing is increasingly relevant to operating costs, trade exposure, supply chains, investment planning and net-zero delivery.

The report also notes that overall carbon-credit issuances rose by 8% between 2024 and 2025, highlighting the continued development of carbon-market infrastructure alongside carbon taxes and emissions-trading systems.

Read the report:
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/05/19/direct-carbon-pricing-covers-nearly-one-third-of-global-emissions

01/09/2026

A new proposal asks whether fossil-fuel producers should be required to fund permanent carbon storage alongside continued oil and gas production.

An open letter to the UK Government reportedly advocates binding geological carbon-storage mandates for major developments, including Rosebank and Jackdaw.

The proposal raises difficult but important questions: who should pay for carbon storage, how should it be verified, and can it help build the infrastructure needed for hard-to-abate emissions without becoming an excuse to delay the wider energy transition?

Read more:
https://carbonherald.com/open-letter-to-uk-government-advocates-carbon-storage-mandates-for-fossil-fuel-producers/

Address

58 Marsh Wall
London
E149TP

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+442036422160

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Global Environmental Partners Ltd posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Global Environmental Partners Ltd:

Shortcuts

Share

Category