16/06/2026
Starbucks sold £556 million of coffee in the UK last year. Their corporation tax bill? They didn’t pay a penny. They got a £13.7 million tax credit against future bills.
Here’s how it works, and it’s all completely legal:
☕ £40 million paid in royalties to a Starbucks entity abroad, just to use the Starbucks name.
☕ They buy their coffee from another Starbucks entity overseas, so the markup lands offshore instead of here.
☕ They borrow money from inside the group and pay interest on it, shrinking the UK profit even further.
Pull those three levers and £556 million of sales magically becomes a £41 million loss on paper. No profit, no tax. Simple.
And this is the bit that gets me. People argue about £100k earners stuck in a 60% tax trap. They argue about benefits. They argue about immigration. But this, multinationals quietly routing profit offshore in plain sight, barely gets a mention.
“But they create jobs.” Do they? There’s clearly demand for coffee in the UK. If Starbucks shut tomorrow, that demand doesn’t vanish. It gets filled by homegrown cafés hiring local and paying full UK tax. Their own staff numbers actually fell by 244 last year.
Thirteen years since we first found out about this. Still legal. Still happening.
So tell me, is this fair? Or is it time to close the loophole? Drop your honest verdict in the comments
Source: Starbucks UK FY25 accounts, filed at Companies House