Email Loans and Homes

04/07/2023

Economic war, power hungry war , civil unrest & the loss of common sense - sheer madness .

03/07/2023

What a beautiful photo. How sad it took 30 years for the chimp to see the sky

The chimp named Vanilla spent the first years of her life in a biomedical research lab in a tiny cage "suspended from the ground," the sanctuary said.

20/05/2023

20/05/2023

Watch out for the unintended consequences!
Taxing property investors more as some state governments are (I'm looking at you QLD); restricting finance for investors, pulling the welcome mat out from foreign investors and increasing the rights of tenants are all hurting those that these measures were meant to help!

01/09/2022

It comes after the US government approved the first small modular nuclear reactor for commercial use.

Full story: https://bit.ly/3cBwGzh

06/08/2022

‘SMART OCEANS’: KILLING OUR SEAS TO SAVE THEM

Ever wondered why agriculture is slammed by governments while private jets, mega-yachts and space rockets are never mentioned?
Or why no-one demonises big emitters like the pharmaceutical industry, or the US military, whose emissions dwarf those of entire nations like Denmark and Portugal?
It’s called ‘Double Standards’ and the Green agenda is littered with them.
Take, for example, ‘Smart Oceans’ and the ‘Internet of Underwater Things” (IoUT).
For two decades, governments, NGOs, researchers, big tech, climate scientists and the military have been building a vast underwater ‘smart grid’, made up of subsea sensor networks, sonar wi-fi, GPS, Li-Fi, lasers, acoustic modems, remotely charged underwater drones and magnetic induction - aimed at strip-mining data from the world’s oceans.
Huge grid installations, resembling HAARP arrays, are positioned on the ocean floor transmitting horizontally and vertically to satellites which communicate with computer monitoring systems all over the world.
These new underwater modems are producing frequencies as powerful as 202 decibels, equivalent to 139 decibels on land. For comparison, noise levels above 85 decibels are regarded as harmful to humans while heavy rock concerts are around 120 decibels.
All done in the name of climate change, sea-level monitoring, pollution control, water treatment, species tracking, weather surveillance, wave science, coral reef harvesting, tectonic plate monitoring, navigation, rare earth mining and military communications.
This year’s Oceanology International Conference featured hundreds of thousands of tiny autonomous underwater drones working together like a Hive to carry out underwater surveillance activity.
The goal is to flood every corner of the world’s oceans with multiple configurations of sonar-delivered data and 5G enabled devices engaged in non-stop surveillance activities.
According to Dr Kogan Paik-Mander of Korea’s Electronic Materials Research Centre, who spoke at last year’s COP26:
“there is no-one counting the devastating impacts that will take place once the smart ocean is fully installed and operating.”
“Marine organisms are highly electrosensitive” she said.
“They use naturally occurring magnetic fields to navigate, orientate and sense prey, mates and predators”. Magnetising their environment with 5G, wi-fi and sonar is clearly going to have an enormously destructive impact on them.
Then there are the studies showing how extremely low frequency and low intensity magnetic fields have adverse impacts on the water itself.
In particular low intensity magnetic fields were found to significantly reduce the oxygen and co2 levels in the water to “below the limit required to satisfy the needs of successful fish production as per ANZECC 2000”.
Could this be what’s really behind the problem of ‘oxygen depletion’ in our oceans?
Who knows?
UNESCO, WEF, WWF, Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd are all silent on the issue.
Like I said, double standards…

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287683929_The_effect_of_electromagnetic_field_on_water_and_fish_Clarias_Garpienus_Zagazig_Egypt
https://vimeo.com/517315319

05/08/2022

GERMANY’S GREEN NIGHTMARE

Remember ‘Energiewende’– the green energy transition that globalists held up as a green energy model for the world.
Between 2000 and 2019, renewables in Germany grew from 7 percent to 35 percent of its electricity.
German politicians were so convinced that gas and coal were stranded assets that they closed all their reliable power generators, without even bothering to build any more to replace them.
Meanwhile, the enormous subsidies paid to the renewables sector helped make German retail power costs the highest in Europe.
No matter. Energiewende was “Germany’s gift to the world” they told us.
In 2020, the German government allocated a record $38 billion to expand green electricity infrastructure even more.
On 7 March 2022, it earmarked another 200 billion for yet more investments in decarbonisation and “greater independence from imported fossil fuels”.
Germany’s Finance Minister Christian Lindner said the funds would be used to expand e-car charging infrastructure, hydrogen production and the construction of more renewable power sources in Germany.
The Minister called renewables “freedom energies”.
He said it with a straight face.
Energiewende has cost Germany $36 billion annually since 2015. By 2025, the total amount spent will hit $580 billion.
But things are not looking so good for Germany’s Energiewende today, with gas flows from Russia at just 20 percent capacity.
In fact things are starting to look very grim indeed.
It might still be the height of summer, but Germany has little time to lose.
City officials are dimming or turning off streetlights - even traffic lights – while municipal pools and gyms switch off the hot water in a race to reduce energy consumption before winter.
German brewers have been told to stop making beer and there is talk of Oktoberfest being cancelled.
Landlords have turned down the heating on rental properties and asked tenants to take shorter showers.
Germany’s presidential palace in Berlin is no longer lit at night and the spotlights on public monuments have all been turned off.
Fifteen percent of German industries have already cut production, while a third say they will do so shortly.
One is chemical giant BASF SE, who says it is planning to cut the gas-intensive production of ammonia — a key component of fertilisers – due to skyrocketing energy costs rendering the business unprofitable.
Our economic system is in danger of collapsing,” the Premier of Saxony told Die Zeit newspaper.
“If we aren’t careful, Germany could become deindustrialised” he said.
Welcome to life under Net Zero!
A world where nights are going to be cold and dark, where hot water will be a luxury and sports stadiums prepare to do double duty as warming areas for Germans so they don’t freeze to death.

28/07/2022

When all looks doom n gloom. It's good to get a more balanced approach to the future ahead

27/07/2022

What does it take to be wealthy?

According to YouGov research, the answer depends on who you ask.
​
40% of Australians reckon if you’re earning more than $150,000 after tax you’re sitting pretty, while 36% say you need to be worth more than $1 million.
Overall, however, Australians are pessimistic about their chances of achieving their dreams of wealth.

The study found only 27% believe they’ll meet their definition of wealthy if they stay in Australia.

The best indicator of ability to grow wealth was inheritances and family wealth, 24% of respondents said.
However, 23% said a high-performing investment strategy was the best indicator, and 5 per cent said having a financial planner was the biggest sign someone would be able to increase wealth.
​
​“What’s clear is that the impact of generational wealth is becoming more stark, and that Australians who aren’t waiting for an inheritance and who aren’t already in the property market don’t have a lot of hope of attaining wealth in their lifetime,” said Dacxi chief executive Ian Lowe told the Australian Financial Review

“It would be unfair to say Australians have given up entirely on being wealthy, but many are having to readjust expectations for what their retirements might look like based on how previous generations have lived past the age of 65.”