16/05/2022
๐ช๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐น๐ผ๐-๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐?
First-home buyers could save about $1,000 a month on their mortgage repayments by choosing Laborโs Help to Buy scheme over the governmentโs , but may trade-off up to $455,000 in equity gains.
Each major party has pledged to help first home buyers, but only the Coalition would allow them to access up to $50,000 of their superannuation.
The Coalition will also retain and expand its low-deposit loan scheme, which allows a purchase with a 5% deposit (raised independently of super) without paying lenders mortgage insurance ( ). Labor will match this and add a shared equity scheme, where it co-purchases a home with the buyer, who may have owned previously.
If a first-home buyer purchases a $900,000 home in Sydney with a 5% deposit of $45,000. Using the First Home Guarantee scheme, their monthly mortgage repayment would be $3,595. But under the Help to Buy program, where the government owns 30% of their home and they have a smaller mortgage, they would pay $2,460 per month, a saving of $1,135.
If property values fall, low-deposit buyers risk owing more money to the bank than their home is worth, known as negative equity.
Assuming a drop in line with economist forecasts, the same home could be worth $799,200 by the end of 2023.
Someone in the unfortunate situation of needing to sell due to job loss or family breakdown would face negative equity of $28,733 under the First Home Guarantee but only $7040 using Help to Buy, because the government shares the loss.
Source: Sydney Morning Herald(SMH)
https://www.smh.com.au/property/news/will-first-home-buyers-be-better-off-using-the-liberal-or-labor-low-deposit-schemes-20220513-p5al1a.html